Make raster tile renderer pool sizes configurable
This commit is contained in:
@@ -95,6 +95,27 @@ Maximum image side length to be allowed to be rendered (including scale factor).
|
||||
Be careful when changing this value since there are hardware limits that need to be considered.
|
||||
Default is ``2048``.
|
||||
|
||||
``minRendererPoolSizes``
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Minimum amount of raster tile renderers per scale factor.
|
||||
The value is an array: the first element is the minimum amount of renderers for scale factor one, the second for scale factor two and so on.
|
||||
If the array has less elements than ``maxScaleFactor``, then the last element is used for all remaining scale factors as well.
|
||||
Selecting renderer pool sizes is a trade-off between memory use and speed.
|
||||
A reasonable value will depend on your hardware and your amount of styles and scale factors.
|
||||
If you have plenty of memory, you'll want to set this equal to ``maxRendererPoolSizes`` to avoid increased latency due to renderer destruction and recreation.
|
||||
If you need to conserve memory, you'll want something lower than ``maxRendererPoolSizes``, possibly allocating more renderers to scale factors that are more common.
|
||||
Default is ``[8, 4, 2]``.
|
||||
|
||||
``maxRendererPoolSizes``
|
||||
------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Maximum amount of raster tile renderers per scale factor.
|
||||
The value and considerations are similar to ``minRendererPoolSizes`` above.
|
||||
If you have plenty of memory, try setting these equal to or slightly above your processor count, e.g. if you have four processors, try a value of ``[6]``.
|
||||
If you need to conserve memory, try lower values for scale factors that are less common.
|
||||
Default is ``[16, 8, 4]``.
|
||||
|
||||
``watermark``
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user