rolling back ;'s after a function declaration, cleaning up some whitespace. no functional changes. all tests still pass ff && ie6. note that it has never been either a policy or a priority for us to maintain coding standards in the test files. I'm only doing this as an exercise for my brain, waiting for the second cup of coffee to kick in.

git-svn-id: http://svn.openlayers.org/trunk/openlayers@4156 dc9f47b5-9b13-0410-9fdd-eb0c1a62fdaf
This commit is contained in:
euzuro
2007-08-31 15:08:38 +00:00
parent a8d7097e67
commit 8ae2a01b66
8 changed files with 186 additions and 101 deletions
+46 -13
View File
@@ -12,30 +12,57 @@
}
var multipoint = new OpenLayers.Feature.Vector(
new OpenLayers.Geometry.MultiPoint([
points[0].geometry, points[1].geometry, points[2].geometry
points[0].geometry,
points[1].geometry,
points[2].geometry
])
);
var linestrings = [
new OpenLayers.Feature.Vector(
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LineString([points[0].geometry, points[1].geometry, points[2].geometry])
),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LineString([
points[0].geometry,
points[1].geometry,
points[2].geometry
])
),
new OpenLayers.Feature.Vector(
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LineString([points[3].geometry, points[4].geometry, points[5].geometry])
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LineString([
points[3].geometry,
points[4].geometry,
points[5].geometry
])
)
];
var multilinestring = new OpenLayers.Feature.Vector(
new OpenLayers.Geometry.MultiLineString([
linestrings[0].geometry, linestrings[1].geometry
linestrings[0].geometry,
linestrings[1].geometry
])
);
var rings = [
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([points[0].geometry, points[1].geometry, points[2].geometry]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([points[3].geometry, points[4].geometry, points[5].geometry]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([points[6].geometry, points[7].geometry, points[8].geometry]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([points[9].geometry, points[10].geometry, points[11].geometry])
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([
points[0].geometry,
points[1].geometry,
points[2].geometry
]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([
points[3].geometry,
points[4].geometry,
points[5].geometry
]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([
points[6].geometry,
points[7].geometry,
points[8].geometry
]),
new OpenLayers.Geometry.LinearRing([
points[9].geometry,
points[10].geometry,
points[11].geometry
])
];
var polygons = [
@@ -49,7 +76,8 @@
var multipolygon = new OpenLayers.Feature.Vector(
new OpenLayers.Geometry.MultiPolygon([
polygons[0].geometry, polygons[1].geometry
polygons[0].geometry,
polygons[1].geometry
])
);
@@ -65,12 +93,15 @@
t.eq(format.foo, "bar", "constructor sets options correctly");
t.eq(typeof format.read, "function", "format has a read function");
t.eq(typeof format.write, "function", "format has a write function");
}
}
function test_Format_WKT_write(t) {
t.plan(7);
var format = new OpenLayers.Format.WKT();
// test a point
t.eq(format.write(points[0]),
"POINT(" + points[0].geometry.x + " " + points[0].geometry.y + ")",
"format correctly writes Point WKT");
@@ -139,9 +170,11 @@
points[2].geometry.x + " " + points[2].geometry.y + "))",
"format correctly writes GeometryCollection WKT");
}
}
function test_Format_WKT_read(t) {
t.plan(7);
var format = new OpenLayers.Format.WKT();
/**
@@ -181,7 +214,7 @@
points[2].geometry.x + " " + points[2].geometry.y + "))",
"format correctly writes GeometryCollection WKT");
}
}
</script>
</head>